What to have in sources.list on an Ubuntu LTS server (production)?

Posted by nbr on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by nbr
Published on 2010-06-09T06:09:41Z Indexed on 2010/06/09 6:12 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 223

Filed under:
|
|

I have several Ubuntu 10.04 LTS servers in production and I'm using apticron to check that my software is up to date, security-wise. However, by default, Ubuntu has the lucid-updates repository enabled. This means lots of low-priority updates (such as this) that I don't need and thus, extra work for me.

Is it okay to just remove the lucid-updates line(s) in sources.list? I still get security updates via lucid-security, right? So, this is what my sources.list would look like.

deb http://se.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid main restricted
deb http://se.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid universe
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid-security main restricted
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid-security universe

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about ubuntu-server

Related posts about updates