Is it ok to use <strong> in place of <b> blindly ?

Posted by metal-gear-solid on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by metal-gear-solid
Published on 2010-02-11T08:15:36Z Indexed on 2010/06/10 17:02 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 333

Note: I know <b> is presentational and <span style="font-weight:bold> is better way and <strong> and <em> for emphasis but my question is not regarding this.


Should we convert every <b> to <strong> blindly ? many people do this they think <b> is not good as per web standards so they convert every <b> to <strong> upon site redesign, content re-population, new site design and people suggest this to others also.


Dreamweaver has also given option to convert all <b> and <i> to <strong> and <em> on code paste in design view and when we use B and I Which people use blindly.

alt text

And Dreamweaver(if above option is checked) and many online WYSIWYG editor give output in <strong> and <em> while button shows B and I.

alt text

In my opinion it's creating misconception about <strong> and <b>


When we get content from client we don't know where client want to give emphasize and where he just want to use text bold for presentation purpose.What we should do in this condition? no one has time client and we both to give time to think for each bold text, it should be in <b> or in <strong>, <i> or in <em>

What are pros and cons to convert every <b> and <i> into <strong> and <em> blindly if we are saying our site is accessible?


Update: remember <b> and <i> are not deprecated there are in HTML 5 specification

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about html

Related posts about XHTML