SQL Server Files Local or NAS or SAN?

Posted by Jedi Master Spooky on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by Jedi Master Spooky
Published on 2009-04-30T12:34:02Z Indexed on 2010/06/10 16:03 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 356

Filed under:

sql-server-2008

|

san

|

nas

|

iscsi

|

server-configuration

I have to install a new Server with SQL Server 2008, What do you recommend, One server with Raid 10 or the Files in a NAS?

What about iSCSI should I use it?

What about SAN?

The server has 4Gb of RAM and that database file is about 2GB.

To make my self clear today the server has no RAID, I have to implement some kind of strategy so if something happend I can have my files safe, so What should I choose Local Files, NAS, SAN? What option has the most performance, what is the more secure?

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about sql-server-2008

Cumulative Update packages for SQL Server 2008 R2 RTM & SQL Server 2008 SP1

as seen on SQL Blogcasts - Search for 'SQL Blogcasts'
Here is the news on Cumulative Update release news on SQL Server 2008 R2 RTM & SQL Server 2008 Service Pack 1. First let us go through SQL Server 2008 R2 RTM cumulative update, release consist the only hotfixes that were released in Cumulative Update 5, 6, & 7 for SQL Server 2008 SP1. Cumulative… >>> More
SQL Server 2008 Vs Sql Server 2008 R2 in web-development

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
This will give many opportunities in Web-development transition from Sql Server 2008 to Sql Server 2008 R2: 1.If database in one instance of SQL Server. 2.a) if in the server PC have 1 processor b) if in the server PC have 4 processors >>> More
SQL Server 2008 to SQL Server 2008

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I have an MDF and LDF file of SQL Server 2005. i attached it with SQL Server 2008 and did some change in data. now when i attached it back to sql server 2005 Express Edition it gives version error. The database 'E:\DB\JOBPERS.MDF' cannot be opened because it is version 655. This server supports version… >>> More
SharePoint 2010 – SQL Server has an unsupported version 10.0.2531.0

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
I am trying to perform a database attach upgrade to SharePoint Foundation 2010. At this point I am trying to attach the content database to a Web application by using Windows Powershell: Mount-SPContentDatabase -Name <DatabaseName> -DatabaseServer <ServerName> -WebApplication <URL>… >>> More
Uninstalling Reporting Server 2008 on Windows Server 2008

as seen on SQL Blog - Search for 'SQL Blog'
Ha. I had quite disputable pleasure of installing and reinstalling and reinstalling and reinstalling – I think about 5 times before it worked – Reporting Server 2008 on Windows Server with the same year number in name. During my struggle I came across an error which seems to be not quite unfamiliar… >>> More

Related posts about san

Connection lost to iscsi san after problem with san

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
Hi there, We have a cluster running with 3 VSpere ESX4 server that all are connected to a lefthand san through iSCSI. This all worked well but a week ago there was a problem with the san. After fixing that problem the VMWARE server continued working but this weekend I saw that 1 server didn't have… >>> More
SAN performance issues storing SQL Server tempdb on a SAN that's being backed up

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
I'm afraid I don't know much about SAN's so please forgive my lack of detail or technical terms. As a developer I've just completed and put on an existing production system a new application but it would appear to have tipped the scales regarding the performance of the backups being taken from the… >>> More
cPanel web servers mounting home partition to a NAS or SAN

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
Hello, I currently have 2 cPanel web servers that are little 1RU dual cpu quad core xeons. They have a lot of resources for processing and handling web requests, and never exceed more than 10% cpu usage. They also have plenty of RAM. The problem is though that they both have RAID 1 160Gb SAS hard… >>> More
SAN with iSCSI-Target Performance Horrendous

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
We have a poor man's SAN setup in a 1U Ubuntu server running iSCSI-Target with two 300GB drives in RAID-0. We then are using it for block level storage for virtual machines. The hypervisor is connected to the SAN via gigabit on a dedicated VLAN and interfaces. We only have a single virtual machine… >>> More
2 Server FC SAN Configuration

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
I have 2 identical servers: -48GB Ram -8GigE NIC's -2FC NIC's -2x72GB RAID1 Hard Drives -Server 2008R2 Host I also Have a Fibre Channel SAN: -16x146GB RAID10 Hard Drives -2xDual-port FC Controllers (Controller A and B both have ports 1 and 2) -Server 1 has Fiber to Ports A1 and B1 -Server 2 has Fiber… >>> More