Contact-to-hire from the perspective of the headhunter agency?
Posted
by jamieb
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by jamieb
Published on 2010-06-11T00:04:21Z
Indexed on
2010/06/11
0:12 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 576
business
|contracting
I operate a small IT consulting firm. One of my clients has expressed an interest in having an ASP.Net programmer on-site at their location for a six-month contract, with an option to hire. I've never really operated my company as a body shop (renting out talent for the long term) and an unfamiliar with how to price my quote. Assume I were to bring on a new developer as a 1099'ed contractor and then contract that person out to my client for the duration of the project.
If I'm billing my client $X per hour for this developer's time, what should I be compensating this developer? $X/2 per hour? What's the typical ratio?
If the client decides to hire this person at the end of the contract, what should I be compensated? Is it a flat finders fee, or maybe a function of the developer's annual salary?
Would there be any advantage to actually hiring the person as a 1040'd employee rather than a 1099 contractor even if I can't offer him benefits? I know other body shops (like Robert Half) do this and never understood why.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner