MySQL-python 1.2.3 and OS X 10.5: 64- or 32-bit?
Posted
by Dave Everitt
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Dave Everitt
Published on 2009-12-28T12:19:14Z
Indexed on
2010/06/11
22:02 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 362
I've been happily using Django and MySQL in development on an existing machine running OS X 10.4 Tiger, and have set up a similar environment in 10.5 Leopard on a new 64-bit MacBook, with a working MySQL and Python 2.6.4.
However, now I want them to communicate, easy_install MySQL-python
gave ld warning
s that the file is not of the required architecture
, which led me to test my Python 2.4.6 install (from the Mac OS X disc image):
>>> import sys
>>> sys.maxint
2147483647
Ah. So my Python install appears to be 32-bit and (I think?) won't install MySQL-python for my 64-bit MySQL. There are lots of hacks out there for MySQL-python on OS X (mostly 1.2.2), but - after hours of reading - I'm pretty sure they won't fix this architecture mismatch. So I'm stuck because I can't decide whether to:
- give up, remove the 64-bit MySQL install (thorough methods, please?) and use the 32-bit MySQL disc image instead;
- re-install Python in 64-bit mode from the tarball,
--with-universal archs-64-bit
and--enable-universalsdk=
as detailed in Python.org's 2.6 news.
So my questions for anyone who has encountered this issue are:
- Is installing 64-bit Python on OS X 10.5 worth bothering with?
- If so, (naive, lazy question!) how are the two required arguments combined?
- If I just skip along in 32-bit (as on my working setup) what am I missing?
I'm after a hassle-free install that's easy to reproduce on other machines (possible student use) so I'd really welcome your opinions, please!
© Stack Overflow or respective owner