Using delegate Types vs methods
Posted
by Grant Sutcliffe
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Grant Sutcliffe
Published on 2010-06-12T14:01:39Z
Indexed on
2010/06/12
14:02 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 200
I see increasing use of the delegate types offered in the System namespace (Action; Predicate etc). As these are delegates, my understanding is that they should be used where we have traditionally used delegates in the past (asynchronous calls; starting threads, event handling etc). Is it just preference or is it considered practice to use these delegate types in scenarios such as the below; rather than using calls to methods we have declared (or anonymous methods):
public void MyMethod {
Action<string> action = delegate(string userName
{
try
{
XmlDocument profile = DataHelper.GetProfile(userName);
UpdateMember(profile);
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
if (_log.IsErrorEnabled) _log.ErrorFormat(exception.Message);
throw (exception);
}
};
GetUsers().ForEach(action); }
At first, I found the code less intuitive to follow than using declared or anonymous methods. I am starting to code this way, and wonder what the view are in this regard. The example above is all within a method. Is this delegate overuse.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner