A good way to write unit tests
Posted
by bobobobo
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by bobobobo
Published on 2010-06-13T17:01:10Z
Indexed on
2010/06/13
17:22 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 174
unit-testing
So, I previously wasn't really in the practice of writing unit tests - now I kind of am and I need to check if I'm on the right track.
Say you have a class that deals with math computations.
class Vector3 { public: // Yes, public. float x,y,z ; // ... ctors ... } ; Vector3 operator+( const Vector3& a, const Vector3 &b ) { return Vector3( a.x + b.y /* oops!! hence the need for unit testing.. */, a.y + b.y, a.z + b.z ) ; }
There are 2 ways I can really think of to do a unit test on a Vector class:
1) Hand-solve some problems, then hard code the numbers into the unit test and pass only if equal to your hand and hard-coded result
bool UnitTest_ClassVector3_operatorPlus() { Vector3 a( 2, 3, 4 ) ; Vector3 b( 5, 6, 7 ) ; Vector3 result = a + b ; // "expected" is computed outside of computer, and // hard coded here. For more complicated operations like // arbitrary axis rotation this takes a bit of paperwork, // but only the final result will ever be entered here. Vector3 expected( 7, 9, 11 ) ; if( result.isNear( expected ) ) return PASS ; else return FAIL ; }
2) Rewrite the computation code very carefully inside the unit test.
bool UnitTest_ClassVector3_operatorPlus() { Vector3 a( 2, 3, 4 ) ; Vector3 b( 5, 6, 7 ) ; Vector3 result = a + b ; // "expected" is computed HERE. This // means all you've done is coded the // same thing twice, hopefully not having // repeated the same mistake again Vector3 expected( 2 + 5, 6 + 3, 4 + 7 ) ; if( result.isNear( expected ) ) return PASS ; else return FAIL ; }
Or is there another way to do something like this?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner