Mockito verify no more interactions but omit getters

Posted by michael lucas on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by michael lucas
Published on 2010-05-27T11:11:28Z Indexed on 2010/06/13 9:02 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 316

Filed under:

unit-testing

|

mock

|

mockito

Mockito api provides method:

Mockito.verifyNoMoreInteractions(someMock);

but is it possible in Mockito to declare that I don't want more interactions with a given mock with the exceptions of interactions with its getter methods?

The simple scenario is the one in which I test that sut changes only certain properties of a given mock and lefts other properties untapped.

In example I want to test that UserActivationService changes property Active on an instance of class User but does't do anything to properties like Role, Password, AccountBalance, etc.

I'm open to criticism regarding my approach to the problem.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about unit-testing

Unit testing best practices for a unit testing newbie

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
In recent years, I have only written small components for people in larger projects or small tools. I have never written a unit test and it always seems like learning how to write them and actually making one takes a lot longer than simply firing up the program and testing for real. I am just about… >>> More
About unit testing a function in the zend framework and unit testing in general

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hello people, I am diving into the world of unit testing. And i am sort of lost. I learned today that unit testing is testing if a function works. I wanted to test the following function: public function getEventById($id) { return $this->getResource('Event')->getEventById($id); } So… >>> More
Unit testing a database connection and general questions on database-dependent code and unit testing

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi, If I have a method which establishes a database connection, how could this method be tested? Returning a bool in the event of a successful connection is one way, but is that the best way? From a testability method, is it best to have the connection method as one method and the method to get… >>> More
What is the objective of unit testing?

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
I've been working with C# for the last 2 years, and I've never done any unit testing. I just need to know what the objective of unit testing is. What kind of results do we expect from unit testing? Is code quality checked by unit testing? In my view, unit testing is the job of testers; if that is… >>> More
Unit testing newbie team needs to unit test

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
I'm working with a new team that has historically not done ANY unit testing. My goal is for the team to eventually employ TDD (Test Driven Development) as their natural process. But since TDD is such a radical mind shift for a non-unit testing team I thought I would just start off with writing unit… >>> More

Related posts about mock

Returning a mock object from a mock object

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
I'm trying to return an object when mocking a parser class. This is the test code using PHPUnit 3.7 //set up the result object that I want to be returned from the call to parse method $parserResult= new ParserResult(); $parserResult->setSegment('some string'); //set up… >>> More
Cactus versus mock objects (jMock, Easy mock)

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm little confused with Cactus and mock objects (jMock, Easy mock). Could anyone please answer the following questions? When to use Cactus for testing? When not to use Cactus for testing? When to use mock objects for testing? When not to use mock objects for testing? >>> More
Mock static method Activator.CreateInstance to return a mock of another class

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I have this factory class and I want to test it correctly. Let's say I have an abstract class which have many child (inheritance). As you can see in my Factory class the method BuildChild, I want to be able to create an instance of a child class at Runtime. I must be able to create this instance… >>> More
How can I make mock-0.6 return a sequence of values?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm using the mock-0.6 library from http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/mock/mock.html to mock out a framework for testing, and I want to have a mock method return a series of values, each time it's called. Right now, this is what I figured should work: def returnList(items): def sideEffect(*args… >>> More
Mocking property sets

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
In this post, i will be showing how you can mock property sets with your expected values or even action using JustMock. To begin, we have a sample interface: public interface IFoo { int Value { get; set; } } Now, we can create a mock that will throw on any call other than the one… >>> More