How to SET ARITHABORT ON for connections in Linq To SQL

Posted by Laurence on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Laurence
Published on 2010-06-03T23:20:55Z Indexed on 2010/06/15 22:22 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 360

Filed under:

linq-to-sql

|

arithabort

|

set-options

By default, the SQL connection option ARITHABORT is OFF for OLEDB connections, which I assume Linq To SQL is using. However I need it to be ON. The reason is that my DB contains some indexed views, and any insert/update/delete operations against tables that are part of an indexed view fail if the connection does not have ARITHABORT ON. Even selects against the indexed view itself fail if the WITH(NOEXPAND) hint is used (which you have to use in SQL Standard Edition to get the performance benefit of the indexed view).

Is there somewhere in the data context I can specify I want this option ON? Or somewhere in code I can do it??

I have managed a clumsy workaround, but I don't like it .... I have to create a stored procedure for every select/insert/update/delete operation, and in this proc first run SET ARITHABORT ON, then exec another proc which contains the actual select/insert/update/delete. In other words the first proc is just a wrapper for the second. It doesn't work to just put SET ARITHABORT ON above the select/insert/update/delete code.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about linq-to-sql

how can i page my linq to sql result set

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Remembering MySQL could use the instruction "limit" to indicate where I was starting my result set and how many wanted to have included. Select * FROM Users Limit [start], [Length] How can I do this in LinqToSql >>> More
LINQ to SQL and missing Many to Many EntityRefs

as seen on West-Wind - Search for 'West-Wind'
Ran into an odd behavior today with a many to many mapping of one of my tables in LINQ to SQL. Many to many mappings aren’t transparent in LINQ to SQL and it maps the link table the same way the SQL schema has it when creating one. In other words LINQ to SQL isn’t smart about many to many mappings… >>> More
Comparing LINQ to SQL vs the classic SqlCommand

as seen on Dot net Slackers - Search for 'Dot net Slackers'
tweetmeme_url = 'http://alpascual.com/blog/comparing-linq-to-sql-vs-the-classic-sqlcommand/';tweetmeme_source = 'alpascual';When you are coming from using SqlCommand and SqlConnection is difficult to move to another library for your database needs. For those people still in the limbo to make the decision… >>> More
Comparing LINQ to SQL vs the classic SqlCommand

as seen on Dot net Slackers - Search for 'Dot net Slackers'
tweetmeme_url = 'http://alpascual.com/blog/comparing-linq-to-sql-vs-the-classic-sqlcommand/';tweetmeme_source = 'alpascual';When you are coming from using SqlCommand and SqlConnection is difficult to move to another library for your database needs. For those people still in the limbo to make the decision… >>> More
LINQ to SQL Profiler

as seen on Dot net Slackers - Search for 'Dot net Slackers'
In this article we will be taking a look at the new LINQ to SQL Profiler from HibernatingRhinos. This tool gives you a view into the goings on of LINQ to SQL. Not only does it allow you to see the SQL that is generated by your LINQ queries but it also shows you information about your connections… >>> More

Related posts about arithabort

How to SET ARITHABORT ON for connections in Linq To SQL

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
By default, the SQL connection option ARITHABORT is OFF for OLEDB connections, which I assume Linq To SQL is using. However I need it to be ON. The reason is that my DB contains some indexed views, and any insert/update/delete operations against tables that are part of an indexed view fail if the… >>> More
Why would SET ARITHABORT ON dramatically speed up a query?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
The query is a single select containing a lot of grouping levels and aggragate operations. With SET ARITHABORT ON is takes less than a second, otherwise it takes several minutes. We have seen this behavior on SQL Server 2000 and 2008. >>> More
SQL SERVER – Check the Isolation Level with DBCC useroptions

as seen on SQL Authority - Search for 'SQL Authority'
In recent consultancy project coordinator asked me – “can you tell me what is the isolation level for this database?” I have worked with different isolation levels but have not ever queried database for the same. I quickly looked up bookonline and found out the DBCC command which… >>> More
SQL Server ':setvar' Error

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I am trying to create some script variables in T-SQL as follows: /* Deployment script for MesProduction_Preloaded_KLM_MesSap */ GO SET ANSI_NULLS, ANSI_PADDING, ANSI_WARNINGS, ARITHABORT, CONCAT_NULL_YIELDS_NULL, QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON; SET NUMERIC_ROUNDABORT OFF; GO … >>> More
Power error handling inside of sql function

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I have a power function call inside of a sql function. What is the correct way to handle overflow and underflow conditions since I cannot use a Try Catch inside of a function. I am also trying to avoid modifying the ARITHABORT, ANSI_WARNINGS, and ARITHIGNORE settings in the calling code. GO CREATE… >>> More