Cheap and cheerful rand() replacement.

Posted by Mick on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Mick
Published on 2010-06-16T10:09:23Z Indexed on 2010/06/16 10:12 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 172

Filed under:

After profiling a large game playing program, I have found that the library function rand() is consuming a considerable fraction of the total processing time. My requirements for the random number generator are not very onerous - its not important that it pass a great battery of statistical tests of pure randomness. I just want something cheap and cheerful that is very fast. Any suggestions?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about c