Bug in Delphi XE RegularExpressions Unit
Posted
by Jan Goyvaerts
on Regular-Expressions.info
See other posts from Regular-Expressions.info
or by Jan Goyvaerts
Published on Wed, 22 Sep 2010 04:16:16 +0000
Indexed on
2010/12/06
16:57 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 364
Regex Trouble
Using the new RegularExpressions unit in Delphi XE, you can iterate over all the matches that a regex finds in a string like this:
procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: TObject); var RegEx: TRegEx; Match: TMatch; begin RegEx := TRegex.Create('\w+'); Match := RegEx.Match('One two three four'); while Match.Success do begin Memo1.Lines.Add(Match.Value); Match := Match.NextMatch; end end;
Or you could save yourself two lines of code by using the static TRegEx.Match
call:
procedure TForm1.Button2Click(Sender: TObject); var Match: TMatch; begin Match := TRegEx.Match('One two three four', '\w+'); while Match.Success do begin Memo1.Lines.Add(Match.Value); Match := Match.NextMatch; end end;
Unfortunately, due to a bug in the RegularExpressions unit, the static call doesn’t work. Depending on your exact code, you may get fewer matches or blank matches than you should, or your application may crash with an access violation.
The RegularExpressions unit defines TRegEx
and TMatch
as records. That way you don’t have to explicitly create and destroy them. Internally, TRegEx
uses TPerlRegEx
to do the heavy lifting. TPerlRegEx
is a class that needs to be created and destroyed like any other class. If you look at the TRegEx
source code, you’ll notice that it uses an interface to destroy the TPerlRegEx
instance when TRegEx
goes out of scope. Interfaces are reference counted in Delphi, making them usable for automatic memory management.
The bug is that TMatch
and TGroupCollection
also need the TPerlRegEx
instance to do their work. TRegEx
passes its TPerlRegEx
instance to TMatch
and TGroupCollection
, but it does not pass the instance of the interface that is responsible for destroying TPerlRegEx
.
This is not a problem in our first code sample. TRegEx
stays in scope until we’re done with TMatch
. The interface is destroyed when Button1Click
exits.
In the second code sample, the static TRegEx.Match
call creates a local variable of type TRegEx
. This local variable goes out of scope when TRegEx.Match
returns. Thus the reference count on the interface reaches zero and TPerlRegEx
is destroyed when TRegEx.Match
returns. When we call MatchAgain
the TMatch
record tries to use a TPerlRegEx
instance that has already been destroyed.
To fix this bug, delete or rename the two RegularExpressions.dcu files and copy RegularExpressions.pas into your source code folder. Make these changes to both the TMatch
and TGroupCollection
records in this unit:
- Declare
FNotifier: IInterface;
in theprivate
section. - Add the parameter
ANotifier: IInterface;
to theCreate
constructor. - Assign
FNotifier := ANotifier;
in the constructor’s implementation.
You also need to add the ANotifier: IInterface;
parameter to the TMatchCollection.Create
constructor.
Now try to compile some code that uses the RegularExpressions
unit. The compiler will flag all calls to TMatch.Create
, TGroupCollection.Create
and TMatchCollection.Create
. Fix them by adding the ANotifier
or FNotifier
parameter, depending on whether ARegEx
or FRegEx
is being passed.
With these fixes, the TPerlRegEx
instance won’t be destroyed until the last TRegEx
, TMatch
, or TGroupCollection
that uses it goes out of scope or is used with a different regular expression.
© Regular-Expressions.info or respective owner