How secure are GUIDs in terms of predictability?

Posted by ssg on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by ssg
Published on 2010-12-23T09:38:33Z Indexed on 2010/12/23 9:54 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 262

Filed under:
|
|

We're using .NET's Guid.NewGuid() to generate activation codes and API keys currently. I wonder if that poses a security problem since their algorithm is open.

.NET Guid uses Win32 CoCreateGuid and I don't know it's internals (possibly MAC address + timestamp?). Can someone derive a second GUID out of the first one, or can he hit it with some smart guesses or is the randomness good enough so search space becomes too big?

Generating random keys have the problem of collision, they need a double check before adding to a database. That's why we stuck with GUIDs but I'm unsure about their security for these purposes.

Here are the 4 consecutive UUIDGEN outputs:

c44dc549-5d92-4330-b451-b29a87848993
d56d4c8d-bfba-4b95-8332-e86d7f204c1c
63cdf958-9d5a-4b63-ae65-74e4237888ea
6fd09369-0fbd-456d-9c06-27fef4c8eca5

Here are 4 of them by Guid.NewGuid():

0652b193-64c6-4c5e-ad06-9990e1ee3791
374b6313-34a0-4c28-b336-bb2ecd879d0f
3c5a345f-3865-4420-a62c-1cdfd2defed9
5b09d7dc-8546-4ccf-9c85-de0bf4f43bf0

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about .NET

Related posts about guid