how to better (inambiguaously) use the terms CAPTCHA and various types of interactions?
Posted
by
vgv8
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by vgv8
Published on 2010-12-23T01:34:45Z
Indexed on
2010/12/23
9:54 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 447
I am working on survey of state-of-the-art and trends of spam prevention techniques.
I observe that non-intrusive, transparent to visitor spam prevention techniques (like context-based filtering or honey traps) are frequently called non-captcha.
Is it correct understanding of term CAPTCHA which is "type of challenge-response [ 2 ]test used in computing to ensure that the response is not generated by a compute" [ 1 ] and challenge-response does not seem to imply obligatory human involvement.
So, which understanding (definition) of term and classification I'd better to stick with? How would I better call CAPTCHA without direct human interaction in order to avoid ambiguity and confusion of terms understnding?
How would I better (succinctly and unambiguously) coin the term for captchas requiring human interaction but without typing into textbox?
How would I better (succinctly and unambiguously) coin the terms to mark the difference between human interaction with images (playing, drag&dropping, rearranging, clicking with images) vs. just recognizing them (and then typing into a textbox the answer without interaction with images)?
PS.
The problem is that recognition of a wiggled word in an image or typing the answer to question is also interaction and when I start to use the terms "interaction", "interactive", "captcha", "protection", "non-captcha", "non-interactive", "static", "dynamic", "visible", "hidden" the terms overlap ambiguously with which another (especailly because the definitions or their actual practice of usage are vague or contradictive).
© Stack Overflow or respective owner