Looking to replace Ghost with FSArchiver or Clonezilla, few questions about capabilities
Posted
by
Daniel Wright
on Server Fault
See other posts from Server Fault
or by Daniel Wright
Published on 2010-08-18T11:20:54Z
Indexed on
2010/12/25
5:55 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 340
I work for a PC Repair company and we are looking into setting up a dedicated machine with externally accessible SATA bays to clone harddrives as a safety net incase something goes wrong during a repair. We currently use a SATA/PATA to USB bridge called MagicBridge and Norton Ghost on any workstation, but we're looking to move away from Ghost.
We have a computer with a large RAID5 array with Windows Server 2008 Standard currently installed, but this can be replaced with a flavour of *nix. I have some experience with Clonezilla, but FSArchiver also seems like a suitable replacment too.
My Head Technician wants to know if my chosen solution (probably Clonezilla or FSArchiver, but I'm open to free suggestions) is capable of:
- Cloning a degraded RAID, such as a single drive from a RAID1 mirror without complaining
- Producing images that are easily mountable (he'd prefer them to be mountable in Windows, but if there is no other easy way, *nix should be fine) akin to Ghost Explorer so individual files can be restored as well as being able to do bare metal restores.
My apologies for wordiness but I wanted to be thorough in my explaination.
Thanks for any suggestions or tips :)
EDIT: I've just found out that Clonezilla has a workaround for cloning RADI1 drives
EDIT2: Found the answer to both of my questions, aparently I wasn't phrasing my searches right, could this question be deleted please?
© Server Fault or respective owner