HTML or Alternate markup for wiki site?
Posted
by
at
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by at
Published on 2010-12-24T01:32:44Z
Indexed on
2011/01/04
3:53 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 335
In choosing an editor for my wiki-like site, I'm debating whether to allow HTML or a custom alternate markup (maybe like wikipedia/wikimedia's or BBCode).
HTML benefits:
- Easy for users to deal with (copying and pasting, learning)
- Somewhat future proof
- Many more editing tools available, usually WYSIWYG too
Alternate markup benefits:
- On the server side I don't have to worry about parsing malicious javascript or styles or HTML that I don't allow
- Can be easy to learn
- Can be easier to decipher if not HTML-savvy
Am I missing something, what's the best solution?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner