Nicer way to deploy a minified Chrome extension

Posted by UVL on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by UVL
Published on 2010-10-29T18:19:08Z Indexed on 2011/01/07 3:53 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 172

Filed under:

deployment

|

obfuscation

|

google-chrome-extension

|

minify

When deploying an extension I follow various steps : copy to a temporary folder all the files, copy/paste back and forth the code to the on-line minifiers / obfuscators and create the zip to be uploaded.

It's obvious that this could be simplified with scripting, but my experience on Windows scripting is very limited (most of my experience is server-side). Do I have to look back to the DOS .bat files like in the 90's or is there some cool tool or method I'm not aware?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about deployment

ClickOnce manifest problem

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
We are currently deploying a WPF 4 app via click once and there is a scenario when the installation fails. If the user does not have .Net 4.0 Full install and attempts to install our app the framework installs fine but the app fails to install. If we re-run the installation again the app installs… >>> More
Creating block devices for openstack deployment using MAAS and juju (nova-volume deployment)

as seen on Ask Ubuntu - Search for 'Ask Ubuntu'
Hi, I'm currently trying to get a openstack deployment working by using MAAS with 9 nodes and juju. To do this I found this guide, working with ubuntu 12.04 LTS https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuCloudInfrastructure and followed it as good as I can. After a vigorous amount of trial and error… >>> More
Error launching application after ClickOnce deployment - "An application for this deployment is alre

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
As part of my continuous integration build the application is deployed as a ClickOnce application. This works great the first time, but when I try the launch the app after an update has been deployed I get the following error. An application for this deployment is already installed with a different … >>> More
JBoss 7.1.1 + Spring 3.1 + JPA 2 (Hibernate 3.6.8) > Cannot parse beans.xml

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Trying to deploy a JSF 2 app with Spring 3.1 + JPA 2 (Hibernte 3.6.8) into JBoss 7.1.1 AS. The app was working fine on tomcat 7. Now, I have already added and changed some configurations. Added jboss-deployment-structure.xml <jboss-deployment-structure xmlns="urn:jboss:deployment-structure:1… >>> More
Disable Java Hardware Acceleration in windows?

as seen on Super User - Search for 'Super User'
I have some issues with my graphics card and I want to disable Hardware Acceleration for java apps. Everything that uses HA is displayed blurry. I've seen some tutorials on how to set this parameter -Dsun.java2d.d3d=false The problem is that the Java Control panel itself is using hardware acceleration… >>> More

Related posts about obfuscation

Does obfuscation affects performance?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Does obfuscating a Java program affect its performance (excluding renaming things)? >>> More
Injection with google guice does not work anymore after obfuscation with proguard

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Has anyone ever tried to combine the use of google guice with obfuscation (in particular proguard)? The obfuscated version of my code does not work with google guice as guice complains about missing type parameters. This information seems to be erased by the transformation step that proguard does… >>> More
Android and obfuscation

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Is there anyone here who have real-world experience on this topic and is willing to share his experiences on subject? Links to guides/code/step-by-step instructions are highly appreciated. Thanks! >>> More
{smartassembly} Software for Code Obfuscation

as seen on Microsoft .NET Support Team - Search for 'Microsoft .NET Support Team'
{smartassembly} is a tool for ensuring that the source code your commercial .NET application isn't visible to anyone with .NET Reflector. Matteo Slaviero, who writes for us about encryption in .NET, asked if he could write a review of {smartassembly} for Simple-Talk. Because we like the product too… >>> More
{smartassembly} software for code obfuscation

as seen on Simple Talk - Search for 'Simple Talk'
{smartassembly} is a tool for ensuring that the source code your commercial .NET application isn't visible to anyone with .NET Reflector. Matteo, who writes for us about encryption in .NET, asked if he could write a review of {smartassembly} for Simple-Talk. Because we like the product too, and Red… >>> More