int vs const int&

Posted by Valdo on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Valdo
Published on 2011-01-16T13:27:21Z Indexed on 2011/01/16 13:53 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 130

Filed under:
|
|
|

I've noticed that I usually use constant references as return values or arguments. I think the reason is that it works almost the same as using non-reference in the code. But it definitely takes more space and function declarations become longer. I'm OK with such code but I think some people my find it a bad programming style.

What do you think? Is it worth writing const int& over int? I think it's optimized by the compiler anyway, so maybe I'm just wasting my time coding it, a?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about c++

Related posts about coding-style