Primary reasons why programming language runtimes use stacks?
Posted
by
manuel aldana
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by manuel aldana
Published on 2011-01-16T17:51:38Z
Indexed on
2011/01/16
17:53 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 246
Many programming language runtime environments use stacks as their primary storage structure (e.g. see JVM bytecode to runtime example).
Quickly recalling I see following advantages:
- Simple structure (pop/push), trivial to implement
- Most processors are anyway optimized for stack operations, so it is very fast
- Less problems with memory fragmentation, it is always about moving memory-pointer up and down for allocation and freeing complete blocks of memory by resetting the pointer to the last entry offset.
Is the list complete or did I miss something? Are there programming language runtime environments which are not using stacks for storage at all?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner