Using a service registry that doesn’t suck Part III: Service testing is part of SOA governance
Posted
by gsusx
on ASP.net Weblogs
See other posts from ASP.net Weblogs
or by gsusx
Published on Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:55:53 GMT
Indexed on
2011/02/01
23:26 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 1426
Filed under:
wcf
|BizTalk Server
|Windows Workflow
|soa
|Web Services
|architecture
|standards
|mvp
|Web Services Interoperabi
|.NET Framework
|Microsoft
|rest
|Tellago
|Governance
|Tellago DevLabs
|Tellago Studios
|SO-Aware
|testing
|WCF Configuration
|WCF Testing
This is the third post of this series intended to highlight some of the principles of modern SOA governance solution. You can read the first two parts here: Using a service registry that doesn’t suck part I: UDDI is dead Using a service registry that doesn’t suck part II: Dear registry, do you have to be a message broker? This time I’ve decided to focus on what of the aspects that drives me ABSOLUTELY INSANE about traditional SOA Governance solutions: service testing or I should I say the lack of...(read more)
© ASP.net Weblogs or respective owner
