What significant lost advances on side tracks should be revived in the main stream of software?

Posted by C.W.Holeman II on Programmers See other posts from Programmers or by C.W.Holeman II
Published on 2011-02-05T16:00:47Z Indexed on 2011/02/06 7:33 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 271

Filed under:
|
|
|

In reading Alan Kay's question on Significant new inventions I was coming up with answers that were not new ideas but old ones that have been passed by in the main stream. So, what significant lost advances that happened on a side track should be revived in the main stream of software?

These would be ideas that worked well in their context but a different context appeared and became dominant the context, even though it lacked the idea. It maybe that in the new dominant context one just cannot do something or it requires great effort to be exerted.

© Programmers or respective owner

Related posts about history

Related posts about ideas