EPL (Eclipse Public Licence) for commercial usage

Posted by code-gijoe on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by code-gijoe
Published on 2011-02-07T19:34:48Z Indexed on 2011/02/07 23:25 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 252

Filed under:
|

Hi,

I'm developing an application which requires a third party framework which is under an Eclipse Public Licence (EPL). The application is a server-side commercial application which will be running on my servers. The EPL software is distributed as binaries (jar files). I'm only using the packages and am not making any contribution, i.e. not making any changes to the source.

Under EPL I believe I'm not a "Contributor" nor am I making a "Contribution". But if I want to make my software available to be installed at some offsite server I'm having trouble with REQUIREMENTS of EPL:

b.iv - "states that source code for the Program is available from such Contributor, and informs licensees how to obtain it in a reasonable manner on or through a medium customarily used for software exchange".

Does this mean that if I where to modify the source code of the 3rd party framework for my own purposes I would need to distribute all of my source code?

EPL is supposed to be commercially friendly but it doesn't seem that way to me.

Thank you.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about open-source

Related posts about licensing