Using MS Moles with datacontext and stored procedures without using a Connection string.

Posted by Brian on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Brian
Published on 2011-02-09T23:22:45Z Indexed on 2011/02/09 23:25 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 404

Filed under:

c#

|

mocking

|

datacontext

|

pex-and-moles

I have just begun to work with MS Moles for testing and I have followed the idea/pattern in which jcollum(thanks) uses a Mole for a table in this stackoverflow question here.

But I am having a problem as I do not want to have to pass a connection string when I use the datasource as such:

using (TheDataContext dataContext = new TheDataContext(myConnectionString))
{
   dataContext.ExecuteStoredprocedure(value, ref ValueExists);
}

I really like the fact that I just need to mole the table and everything else is done for me. I realize I could just mole the ExecuteStoredProcedure method, but I am wondering if I could just somehow avoid the sql exception I am getting here when I do not pass in the connection string. Or, if I there is a better way to do this?

Therefore, does anyone have a solution so that I can avoid placing in the connection string? Thanks in advance.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about c#

.NET WebRequest.PreAuthenticate not quite what it sounds like

as seen on West-Wind - Search for 'West-Wind'
I’ve run into the problem a few times now: How to pre-authenticate .NET WebRequest calls doing an HTTP call to the server – essentially send authentication credentials on the very first request instead of waiting for a server challenge first? At first glance this sound like it should be easy:… >>> More
HttpWebRequest and Ignoring SSL Certificate Errors

as seen on West-Wind - Search for 'West-Wind'
Man I can't believe this. I'm still mucking around with OFX servers and it drives me absolutely crazy how some these servers are just so unbelievably misconfigured. I've recently hit three different 3 major brokerages which fail HTTP validation with bad or corrupt certificates at least according to… >>> More
The dynamic Type in C# Simplifies COM Member Access from Visual FoxPro

as seen on West-Wind - Search for 'West-Wind'
I’ve written quite a bit about Visual FoxPro interoperating with .NET in the past both for ASP.NET interacting with Visual FoxPro COM objects as well as Visual FoxPro calling into .NET code via COM Interop. COM Interop with Visual FoxPro has a number of problems but one of them at least got a lot… >>> More
Dynamic Type to do away with Reflection

as seen on West-Wind - Search for 'West-Wind'
The dynamic type in C# 4.0 is a welcome addition to the language. One thing I’ve been doing a lot with it is to remove explicit Reflection code that’s often necessary when you ‘dynamically’ need to walk and object hierarchy. In the past I’ve had a number of ReflectionUtils that used string based expressions… >>> More
Finding a Relative Path in .NET

as seen on West-Wind - Search for 'West-Wind'
Here’s a nice and simple path utility that I’ve needed in a number of applications: I need to find a relative path based on a base path. So if I’m working in a folder called c:\temp\templates\ and I want to find a relative path for c:\temp\templates\subdir\test.txt I want to receive back subdir\test… >>> More

Related posts about mocking

Mocking successive calls of similar type via sequential mocking

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
In this post , i show how you can benefit from sequential mocking feature[In JustMock] for setting up expectations with successive calls of same type. To start let’s first consider the following dummy database and entity class. public class Person { public virtual string Name… >>> More
Mocking successive calls of similar type via sequential mocking

as seen on Dot net Slackers - Search for 'Dot net Slackers'
In this post , i show how you can benefit from sequential mocking feature[In JustMock] for setting up expectations with successive calls of same type. To start lets first consider the following dummy database and entity class. public class Person { public virtual string Name { get;… >>> More
Auto Mocking using JustMock

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
Auto mocking containers are designed to reduce the friction of keeping unit test beds in sync with the code being tested as systems are updated and evolve over time. This is one sentence how you define auto mocking. Of course this is a more or less formal. In a more informal way auto mocking containers… >>> More
not using partial mocking? do they also mean in web-app?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Im learning Mockito and in chapter 16 they say you should not use partial mocking in new system. I disagree, for example in one of my actions i use partial mocking for static framework methods, sql calls, etc. I extracted the stuff into methods and then mock it in tests. Most of those methods are… >>> More
Talks Submitted for Ann Arbor Day of .NET 2010

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
Just submitted my session abstracts for Ann Arbor's Day of .NET 2010. Getting up to speed with .NET 3.5 -- Just in time for 4.0! Yes, C# 4.0 is just around the corner. But if you haven't had the chance to use C# 3.5 extensively, this session will start from the ground up with the new… >>> More