many partitions on a single filegroup?¿ does it make sense?

Posted by river0 on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by river0
Published on 2011-02-11T20:09:31Z Indexed on 2011/02/11 23:27 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 657

Hi, I'm designing a datawarehouse solution and I'm a newbie in disk configuration issues, let me explain you.

Our storage is spread over 6 storage enlosures having each of them 5 raid-1 disk arrays, and having 2 LUNS defined per each disk array, which makes a total 48 LUNS (this is following Microsoft fast track recommendations for datawarehouse architectures).

I would like to partition my data, on other projects I have worked before, we always followed a 1 partition - 1 filegroup rule. On the microsoft fast track recomendations it is advised to create a filegroup and then for that filegroup a data file per each lun... but I pretend to have a week level partitioning... if I apply that rule I think that I'll get too many files and a complex layout.

I'm thinking of just creating just one filegroup (with the 48 lun data files), but still create the partitions since I want to keep soem of the benefits of partitions like partition switching... Is this scenario not recommended? What would you suggest?

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about sql-server

Related posts about storage