Splunk is fantastically expensive: What are the alternatives?
Posted
by
samsmith
on Server Fault
See other posts from Server Fault
or by samsmith
Published on 2011-02-23T20:28:53Z
Indexed on
2011/02/23
23:27 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 283
This has been discussed, but it has been several months, so it may be time to revisit it:
Earlier discussion RE Splunk alternatives
For the record, Splunk rocks. But the pricing is simply beyond what we can consider (When I spoke with Splunk today, the cost for a system to index 5gb/day of data is over $30,000.)
That is more than we spend on SQL Server (by a large multiple), more than we spend on a rack of servers (by a multiple), etc. etc.
The splunk sales team is correct (that for $30K we get more value and functionality than if we spend the same building our own system), but it doesn't matter. The splunk cost is simply too high (by a multiple).
Soooooo, we are looking around!
Is anyone out there building a splunk like system?
Our basic need:
- Able to listen for syslog messages on multiple udp ports
- Able to index the incoming data in an async way
- Some kind of search engine
- Some kind of UI
- An API to the search engine (to embed in our console)
We currently need to index 3-5gb/day, but need to be able to scale to 10gb/day or more. We do not need a lot of history (30 days is fine).
We use Windows 2008 and 2003 servers.
Thanks for your thoughts!
© Server Fault or respective owner