Some clarification needed about synchronous versus asynchronous asio operations

Posted by Old newbie on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Old newbie
Published on 2011-03-12T13:05:36Z Indexed on 2011/03/12 16:10 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 277

As far as I know, the main difference between synchronous and asynchronous operations. I.e. write() or read() vs async_write() and async_read() is that the former, don't return until the operation finish -or error-, and the last ones, returns inmediately.

Due the fact that the asynchronous operations are controlled by an io_service.run() that does not finish until the controlled operations has finalized. It seems to me that in sequencial operations as those involved in TCP/IP connections with protocols such as POP3, in which the operaton is a sequence such as:

 C: <connect>
 S: Ok.
 C: User...
 S: Ok.
 C: Password
 S: Ok.
 C: Command
 S: answer
 C: Command
 S: answer
 ...
 C: bye
 S: <close>

The difference between synchronous/asynchronous opperatons does not make much sense.

Of course, in both operations there is allways the risk that the program flow stops indefinitely by some circunstance -there the use of timers-, but I would like know some more authorized opinions in this matter.

I must admit that the question is rather ill-defined, but I like hear some advices about when use one or other, because I've problems in debugging with MS Visual Studio, asynchronous SSL operations in a POP3 client in wich I'm working now -about some of who surely I would write here soon-, and sometimes think that perhaps is a bad idea use asynchronous in this.

Not to say that I'm an absolute newbie with this librarys, that additionally to the difficult with the idioma, and some obscure concepts in the STL, must suffer the brevity of the asio documentation.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about asynchronous

Related posts about boost-asio