Abstract away a compound identity value for use in business logic?
Posted
by
John K
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by John K
Published on 2011-03-13T00:05:02Z
Indexed on
2011/03/13
0:10 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 150
While separating business logic and data access logic into two different assemblies, I want to abstract away the concept of identity so that the business logic deals with one consistent identity without having to understand its actual representation in the data source.
I've been calling this a compound identity abstraction.
Data sources in this project are swappable and various and the business logic shouldn't care which data source is currently in use. The identity is the toughest part because its implementation can change per kind of data source, whereas other fields like name, address, etc are consistently scalar values.
What I'm searching for is a good way to abstract the concept of identity, whether it be an existing library, a software pattern or just a solid good idea of some kind is provided.
The proposed compound identity value would have to be comparable and usable in the business logic and passed back to the data source to specify records, entities and/or documents to affect, so the data source must be able to parse back out the details of its own compound ids.
Data Source Examples:
This serves to provide an idea of what I mean by various data sources having different identity implementations.
A relational data source might express a piece of content with an integer identifier plus a language specific code. For example.
content_id language Other Columns expressing details of content 1 en_us 1 fr_ca
The identity of the first record in the above example is: 1 + en_us
However when a NoSQL data source is substituted, it might somehow represent each piece of content with a GUID string 936DA01F-9ABD-4d9d-80C7-02AF85C822A8 plus language code of a different standardization,
And a third kind of data source might use just a simple scalar value.
So on and so forth, you get the idea.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner