Bacula vs. BackupPC

Posted by chronoz on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by chronoz
Published on 2011-06-20T15:15:19Z Indexed on 2011/06/20 16:25 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 302

Filed under:
|
|
|
|

I have been googling about the differences between them.

  • Bacula has lots of roles
  • BackupPC is easier to configure
  • Bacula works with agent, not rsync (great for Windows backups)

It seems that Bacula is most often compared to Amanda though, while BackupPC seems a perfectly lovely and popular backup distribution to.

I currently backup my servers with rsnapshot, but I am looking for a professional scalable solution that could also back-up 50 hosts without problems. Preferably a solution that can offer bare metal restores for my Linux servers. I am not looking to reinstall the exact same version of Plesk, the software, etc...

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about backup

Related posts about debian