EOFs in Solaris 11
Posted
by nospam(at)example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)
on Oracle Blogs
See other posts from Oracle Blogs
or by nospam(at)example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)
Published on Sun, 19 Jun 2011 05:58:34 -0700
Indexed on
2011/06/20
16:32 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 219
Well ? from comments here and elsewhere, the two most worst things seemed to be the the removal of 32-bit support and removal of support for certain components.
Just to set things into perspective: Solaris 10 was released 2005, the newsest class of machines not supported by it were the Ultra1. This one was released 1995. The UltraSPARC-Systems not able to run on Solaris 11 were released 2001. Well ? we have 2011 now ?.
Regarding 32-bit support: Well ? I don't think "playing around with Solaris on old gear" is the problem. At first, most people are playing around with virtual machines. But there is something different: 64-bit computing was introduced for x86 in 2003 (yes ? it's really that old). I think this move is more hurting to the people using boards with the first-gen Intel Atom "Silverthorne" as small file servers.
And then Solaris 10 won't disappear with Solaris 11 ?
Just to set things into perspective: Solaris 10 was released 2005, the newsest class of machines not supported by it were the Ultra1. This one was released 1995. The UltraSPARC-Systems not able to run on Solaris 11 were released 2001. Well ? we have 2011 now ?.
Regarding 32-bit support: Well ? I don't think "playing around with Solaris on old gear" is the problem. At first, most people are playing around with virtual machines. But there is something different: 64-bit computing was introduced for x86 in 2003 (yes ? it's really that old). I think this move is more hurting to the people using boards with the first-gen Intel Atom "Silverthorne" as small file servers.
And then Solaris 10 won't disappear with Solaris 11 ?
© Oracle Blogs or respective owner
