What's the risk of running a Domain Controller so that it is accessible from the internet?

Posted by Adrian Grigore on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by Adrian Grigore
Published on 2011-06-22T23:26:32Z Indexed on 2011/06/23 0:24 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 589

I have three remote dedicated web servers at different webhosts. Adding them to a common domain would make a lot of administration tasks much easier. Since two of the servers are running Windows 2008 R2 Standard, I thought about promoting them to Domain Controllers in order to set up the windows domain. There's another thread at Serverfault that recommends this.

At the same time I've read a lot of times on different websites that this is not a good idea because an domain controller should always be behind a firewall LAN. But I can't set up something like this because I don't have a LAN with a static IP accessible from the internet. In fact I don't even have a windows server in my LAN.

What I have not found out is why exposing a DC to the Internet would be bad idea.

The only risk I can see is that if someone penetrates one of my webservers, it should be much easier to penetrate the others as well. But as far as I can see that's the worst case scenario since I am only going my web servers to that domain, not any computers from my local network.

Is this the only downside or does it also make it easier to penetrate one of my web servers in the first place?

Thanks,

Adrian

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about windows-server-2008

Related posts about active-directory