Read/Write versus Create/Read/Update/Delete permissions difference
Posted
by
archmeta
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by archmeta
Published on 2011-11-14T09:47:23Z
Indexed on
2011/11/14
9:50 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 212
From a practical standpoint, is there any real-world difference between Read/Write permissions and Create/Read/Update/Delete permissions?
It would seem that if a user had the ability to 'create', he should always have the ability to 'update' or 'delete'? If this is correct, then read/write should always be sufficient, and there is no need to store separate Create/Read/Update/Delete permissions?
Are there any real-world use cases in which a user should be given permissions to create but not update, or update but not delete, etc...?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner
