Why was Tanenbaum wrong in the Tanenbaum-Torvalds debates?
Posted
by
Robz
on Programmers
See other posts from Programmers
or by Robz
Published on 2012-03-21T22:55:13Z
Indexed on
2012/03/22
17:41 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 199
operating-systems
|kernel
I was recently assigned reading from the Tanenbaum-Torvalds debates in my OS class. In the debates, Tanenbaum makes some predictions:
- Microkernels are the future
- x86 will die out and RISC architectures will dominate the market
- (5 years from then) everyone will be running a free GNU OS
I was a one year old when the debates happened, so I lack historical intuition. Why have these predictions not panned out? It seems to me, that from Tanenbaum's perspective, they're pretty reasonable predictions of the future. What happened so that they didn't come to pass?
© Programmers or respective owner