Multi-tenancy - single database vs multiple database
Posted
by
RichardW1001
on Programmers
See other posts from Programmers
or by RichardW1001
Published on 2012-03-23T21:07:24Z
Indexed on
2012/03/23
23:39 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 1060
database-design
|projects-and-solutions
We have a number of clients, whose systems share some functionality, but also have quite a degree of diversity. The number of clients is growing - always a healthy thing! - and the diversity between their businesses is also increasing.
At present there is a single ASP.Net (Web Forms) Web Site (as opposed to web project), which has sub-folders for each tenant, with that tenant's non-standard pages. There is a separate model project, which deals with database access and business logic.
Which is preferable - and most importantly, why - between having (a) 1 database per client, with only the features associated with that client; or (b) a single database shared by all clients, where only a subset of tables are used by any one client.
The main concerns within the business are over:
- maintenance of multiple assets - backups, version control and the like
- promoting re-use as much as possible
How would you ensure these concerns are addressed, which solution is preferable, and why? (I have been also compiling responses to similar questions)
© Programmers or respective owner