MPL 1.1 and APL 2.0 License compatibility

Posted by Kenneth Cochran on Programmers See other posts from Programmers or by Kenneth Cochran
Published on 2011-09-14T16:33:07Z Indexed on 2012/04/07 17:45 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 496

Filed under:

licensing

|

mpl

|

apache-license

I am working a project that is licensed under the MPL 1.1 and would like to incorporate some code that is licensed under the APL 2.0.

I know in 2010 Mozilla announced they were updating the MPL to make it more "Apache compatible" among other things.

I'm no lawyer. Exactly what part(s) of the MPL 1.1 don't jive with the APL 2.0 and vice versa? The project has very few of its original contributers still actively involved so I doubt I'd be able to contact all of them to get permission to change the license.

© Programmers or respective owner

Related posts about licensing

Windows Server 2008 / SQL 2008 Licensing for Authenticated Web Application

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
Hello, I'm trying to crunch some numbers to see what the software costs involved are for hosting an application we are developing. Users will not be anonymous - they will need to log in. SQL Server 2008: SQL Server licensing is easy - it will be licensed per-processor. No real fuss there. The… >>> More
Copy protection and licensing tools.

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm new to stackoverflow.com after hearing about it from Jon Skeet on DotNetRocks.This seems like the perfect place to ask this question. I am in the middle of trying to find a 3rd party Copy protection and licensing tool. The company that I work with have 4 products that need to be protected. We… >>> More
Don't Forget About Software Licensing

as seen on Internet.com - Search for 'Internet.com'
Is your company developing software for sale or distribution? If yes, your company needs a sales policy and a flexible, commercially feasible licensing model. >>> More
Need help with software licensing? Read on…

as seen on Geeks with Blogs - Search for 'Geeks with Blogs'
Figuring out which software licensing options best suit your needs while being cost-effective can be confusing. Some businesses end up making their purchases through retail stores which means they miss out on volume licensing opportunities and others may unknowingly be using unlicensed software which… >>> More
Can I use `UnlockCommercialFeatures` for developing Java applications without a commercial license?

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
As of Java 7 Update 40, Oracle is now including Java Mission Control in the JDK. Being always interested in a new profiling tool, I decided to check it out. However, trying to start Flight Recorder against a process, I get the following error, Now I'm getting cold feet about adding the JVM option… >>> More

Related posts about mpl

How to loop through a boost::mpl::list?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
This is as far as I've gotten, #include <boost/mpl/list.hpp> #include <algorithm> namespace mpl = boost::mpl; class RunAround {}; class HopUpAndDown {}; class Sleep {}; template<typename Instructions> int doThis(); template<> int doThis<RunAround>() { /* run run… >>> More
C++ boost mpl vector

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I understand that the following code won't work, as i is a runtime parameter and not a compile time parameter. But i want to know, whether there is a way to achieve the same. i have a list of classes and i need to call a template function, with each of these classes. void GucTable::refreshSessionParams() { … >>> More
What are the key differences between MPL (Mozilla) and MIT licenses

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm relatively familiar with the MIT license. What are the differences (and similarities) between it and the MPL (Mozilla Public License) both when releasing a project as MPL and when using MPL in my own project. >>> More
MPL 1.1 and APL 2.0 License compatibility

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
I am working a project that is licensed under the MPL 1.1 and would like to incorporate some code that is licensed under the APL 2.0. I know in 2010 Mozilla announced they were updating the MPL to make it more "Apache compatible" among other things. I'm no lawyer. Exactly what part(s) of the MPL… >>> More
MPL with Commercial Use Restrictions (And Other Questions)

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
So basicly I want to use MPL 2.0 for my open source software but I also want to forbid commercial use. I'm not a legal expert, that's why I'm asking. Should I use dual-license (MPL + Modified BSD License)? Or what does sublicensing mean? If I wanted to license my project, I would include a notice… >>> More