Do (statically linked) DLLs use a different heap than the main program?
Posted
by
happy_emi
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by happy_emi
Published on 2012-05-30T16:11:50Z
Indexed on
2012/05/30
16:41 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 175
I'm new to Windows programming and I've just "lost" two hours hunting a bug which everyone seems aware of: you cannot create an object on the heap in a DLL and destroy it in another DLL (or in the main program).
I'm almost sure that on Linux/Unix this is NOT the case (if it is, please say it, but I'm pretty sure I did that thousands of times without problems...).
At this point I have a couple of questions:
1) Do statically linked DLLs use a different heap than the main program?
2) Is the statically linked DLL mapped in the same process space of the main program? (I'm quite sure the answer here is a big YES otherwise it wouldn't make sense passing pointers from a function in the main program to a function in a DLL).
I'm talking about plain/regular DLL, not COM/ATL services
EDIT: By "statically linked" I mean that I don't use LoadLibrary to load the DLL but I link with the stub library
© Stack Overflow or respective owner