Can I use a method as a lambda?

Posted by NewAlexandria on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by NewAlexandria
Published on 2012-08-27T20:59:07Z Indexed on 2012/08/27 21:38 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 123

I have an interface the defines a group of conditions. it is one of several such interfaces that will live with other models.

These conditions will be called by a message queue handler to determine completeness of an alert. All the alert calls will be the same, and so I seek to DRY up the enqueue calls a bit, by abstracting the the conditions into their own methods (i question if methods is the right technique). I think that by doing this I will be able to test each of these conditions.

class Loan
  module AlertTriggers
    def self.included(base)
      base.extend           LifecycleScopeEnqueues

      # this isn't right
      Loan::AlertTriggers::LifecycleScopeEnqueues.instance_method.each do |cond|

        class << self
          def self.cond
            ::AlertHandler.enqueue_alerts(
              {:trigger => Loan.new}, 
              cond
            )
          end
        end

      end
    end
  end

  module LifecycleScopeEnqueues
    def student_awaiting_cosigner 
        lambda { |interval, send_limit, excluding|
          excluding ||= ''
          Loan.awaiting_cosigner.
            where('loans.id not in (?)', excluding.map(&:id) ).
            joins(:petitions).
            where('petitions.updated_at > ?', interval.days.ago).
            where('petitions.updated_at <= ?', send_limit.days.ago) 
        }
    end
  end

I've considered alternatives, where each of these methods act like a scope. Down that road, I'm not sure how to have AlertHandler be the source of interval, send_limit, and excluding, which it passes to the block/proc when calling it.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about ruby

Related posts about class