C++ code which is slower than its C equivalent?

Posted by user997112 on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by user997112
Published on 2012-09-11T21:26:05Z Indexed on 2012/09/11 21:38 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 192

Filed under:
|
|
|

Are there any aspects to the C++ programming language where the code is known to be slower than the equivalent C language? Obviously this would be excluding the OO features like virtual functions and vtable features etc.

I am wondering whether, when you are programming in a latency-critical area (and you aren't worried about OO features) whether you could stick with basic C++ or would C be better?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about c++

Related posts about c