Are dynamic languages at disadvantage for agile development?

Posted by Gerenuk on Programmers See other posts from Programmers or by Gerenuk
Published on 2012-09-24T21:43:47Z Indexed on 2012/09/24 21:48 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 235

Filed under:
|

From what I've read agile development often involves refactoring or reverse engineering code into diagrams. Of course there is much more than that, but if we consider the practices that rely on these two methods, are dynamically typed languages at disadvantage? It seem static typing would make refactoring and reverse engineering much easier? Refactoring or (automated) reverse engineering is hard if not impossible in dynamically typed languages? What does real world projects tell about usage of dynamically typed languages for agile methodology?

© Programmers or respective owner

Related posts about agile

Related posts about dynamic-typing