Why isn't functional language syntax more close to human language?

Posted by JohnDoDo on Programmers See other posts from Programmers or by JohnDoDo
Published on 2012-10-05T09:48:07Z Indexed on 2012/10/08 15:52 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 203

I'm interested in functional programming and decided to get head to head with Haskell. My head hurts... but I'll eventually get it... I have one curiosity though, why is the syntax so cryptic (in lack of another word)?

Is there a reason why it isn't more expressive, more close to human language?

I understand that FP is good at modelling mathematical concepts and it borrowed some of it's concise means of expression, but still it's not math... it's a language.

© Programmers or respective owner

Related posts about programming-languages

Related posts about functional-programming