What is the potential for a FUSE mount to destabilize a Linux server?
Posted
by
200_success
on Server Fault
See other posts from Server Fault
or by 200_success
Published on 2012-10-09T03:32:10Z
Indexed on
2012/10/09
3:39 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 121
I'm a sysadmin for a multi-user server, where students in our department have shell accounts. One of our users has requested that we install sshfs
on it. I'm debating whether it would be wise to install sshfs
as suggested.
My main concern is whether a FUSE mount could make our server less reliable. In my experience, bad things can happen to servers when an NFS server suddenly becomes unavailable — the load average shoots up, and you might not be able to unmount it cleanly, to the point where a hard reboot might be necessary. If a FUSE-mounted server suddenly disappears, how hard might it be to clean up the mess? Are there any other likely catastrophes or gotchas I should consider?
At least with NFS, only root can mount, and we can choose to mount NFS servers that we consider to be reasonably reliable.
Let's assume that our users have no hostile intentions, but might do stupid things accidentally. Also, I'm not really worried about the contents of the filesystems they might mount, since our users already have shell access and can copy anything they want to their home directory.
© Server Fault or respective owner