Open Source Licenses, which one?
Posted
by
sam
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by sam
Published on 2012-10-13T03:27:28Z
Indexed on
2012/10/13
3:36 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 103
recently I created a java class " Custom Layout Manager ", which I want to make it open-source and distribute it. So it's not really a "product", nor a "complete program".
Here's the list of permissions and specifications:
- You are free to use and modify with some limitations (packages and classes names, should remain the same, if you want another name, extend this class. - The .jar file, project name is ok to change).
- You don't need to share your modifications.
- You can't modify and then sell it to others.
- You can use it as part of your commercial software
(For example:
It's OK if: you created an instant messaging program, that uses my "Layout", since your "core bussiness" isn't the "Layout", but the msg program.
It's NOT OK if: you created another "Layout" by extending it, added some features and sell it.) - You can't remove the author's name nor the author's website address.
- You are free to donate. :D
Basically, it's free and it's Ok as you give me credits and don't make money with it.
I guess it might be a little bit complex, since you use it "commercially" but cannot sell it separately.
I have seeked almost all the licenses, and the closest one was MIT license, but it says that you can sell it, so I don't really want to use this one.
Is there any license that fits all these permissions I stated?
Thanks.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner