How to handle bugs that I think I fixed, but I'm not entirely sure

Posted by vsz on Programmers See other posts from Programmers or by vsz
Published on 2012-04-26T06:31:47Z Indexed on 2012/10/17 23:20 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 327

Filed under:
|

There are some types of bugs which are very hard to reproduce, happen very rarely and seemingly by random. It can happen, that I find a possible cause, fix it, test the program, and can't reproduce the bug. However, as it was impossible to reliably reproduce the bug and it happened so rarely, how can I indicate this in a bugtracker? What is the common way of doing it?

If I set the status to fixed, and the solution to fixed, it would mean something completely fixed, wouldn't it?

Is it common practice to set the status to fixed and the solution to open, to indicate to the testers, that "it's probably fixed, but needs more attention to make sure" ?

Edit: most (if not all) bugtrackers have two properties for the status of a bug, maybe the names are not the same. By status I mean new, assigned, fixed, closed, etc., and by solution I mean open (new), fixed, unsolvable, not reproducible, duplicate, not a bug, etc.

© Programmers or respective owner

Related posts about testing

Related posts about issue-tracking