SQL Server insert performance with and without primary key
Posted
by
Eric
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Eric
Published on 2011-04-01T04:58:24Z
Indexed on
2012/10/17
23:01 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 165
sql-server
Summary: I have a table populated via the following:
insert into the_table (...) select ... from some_other_table
Running the above query with no primary key on the_table is ~15x faster than running it with a primary key, and I don't understand why.
The details: I think this is best explained through code examples.
I have a table:
create table the_table (
a int not null,
b smallint not null,
c tinyint not null
);
If I add a primary key, this insert query is terribly slow:
alter table the_table
add constraint PK_the_table primary key(a, b);
-- Inserting ~880,000 rows
insert into the_table (a,b,c)
select a,b,c from some_view;
Without the primary key, the same insert query is about 15x faster. However, after populating the_table without a primary key, I can add the primary key constraint and that only takes a few seconds. This one really makes no sense to me.
More info:
- The estimated execution plan shows 0% total query time spent on the clustered index insert
- SQL Server 2008 R2 Developer edition, 10.50.1600
Any ideas?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner