SQL Server insert performance with and without primary key

Posted by Eric on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Eric
Published on 2011-04-01T04:58:24Z Indexed on 2012/10/17 23:01 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 165

Filed under:

Summary: I have a table populated via the following:

insert into the_table (...) select ... from some_other_table

Running the above query with no primary key on the_table is ~15x faster than running it with a primary key, and I don't understand why.

The details: I think this is best explained through code examples.

I have a table:

create table the_table (
    a int not null,
    b smallint not null,
    c tinyint not null
);

If I add a primary key, this insert query is terribly slow:

alter table the_table
    add constraint PK_the_table primary key(a, b);

-- Inserting ~880,000 rows
insert into the_table (a,b,c)
    select a,b,c from some_view;

Without the primary key, the same insert query is about 15x faster. However, after populating the_table without a primary key, I can add the primary key constraint and that only takes a few seconds. This one really makes no sense to me.

More info:

  • The estimated execution plan shows 0% total query time spent on the clustered index insert
  • SQL Server 2008 R2 Developer edition, 10.50.1600

Any ideas?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about sql-server