Classless tables possible with Datamapper?
Posted
by
barerd
on Programmers
See other posts from Programmers
or by barerd
Published on 2012-10-19T22:04:33Z
Indexed on
2012/10/19
23:19 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 184
I have an Item class with the following attributes:
itemId,name,weight,volume,price,required_skills,required_items
.
Since the last two attributes are going to be multivalued, I removed them and create new schemes like:
itemID,required_skill
(itemID
is foreign key, itemID and required_skill
is primary key.)
Now, I'm confused how to create/use this new table. Here are the options that came to my mind:
1) The relationship between Items and Required_skills is one-to-many, so I may create a RequiredSkill class, which belongs_to Item, which in turn has n RequiredSkills. Then I can do Item.get(1).requiredskills
. This sounds most logical to me.
2) Since required_skills may well be thought of as constants (since they resemble rules), I may put them into a hash or gdbm database or another sql table and query from there, which I don't prefer.
My question is: is there sth like a modelless table in datamapper, where datamapper is responsible from the creation and integrity of the table and allows me to query it in datamapper way, but does not require a class, like I may do it in sql?
© Programmers or respective owner