What does it mean to say "Instance variables are not over-rided" in java?

Posted by Ankit on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Ankit
Published on 2012-10-22T09:24:33Z Indexed on 2012/10/22 11:00 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 246

Filed under:
|

I am aware of the concept called field hiding in java. But still I am having a confusion in relation to instance variable being not over-ridden.

According to my present knowledge, overriding a method of super-class means that the JVM will call the sub-class's over-ridden method though the super-class's method is available to the sub-class.

And I read the similar thing for field hiding via the link:- Hiding Fields

So, in any case we are over-ridding the instance if we change the values of the inherited instance variable in the sub-class.

I am confused please help.


I am using the following super-class:-

public class Animal{
File picture;
String food;
int hunger;
int width, height;
int xcoord, ycoord;

public void makeNoise(){
.........
}

public void eat(){
.............
}

public void sleep(){
..........
}

public void roam(){
.............
}

}

It has sub-classes like Tiger, cat, dog,hippo etc. The sub-classes over-ride the makeNoise(), eat and roam() method.

But each sub-class also uses a different set of values for instance variables.

So as per my confusion, I am kind-of overriding all the instance variables and 3 methods of the super-class Animal; and I still have the super-class instance variables available to the sub-class with the use of the super keyword.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about java

Related posts about member-hiding