Should websites live in /var/ or /usr/ according to recommended usage?
Posted
by
nbolton
on Server Fault
See other posts from Server Fault
or by nbolton
Published on 2010-01-14T08:04:28Z
Indexed on
2012/10/30
5:06 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 485
According to a guide on the Linux directory structure, /usr/
is for application files, and /var/
is for files that change (I assume this means "files that belong to the applications"). Is this correct?
If this is the case then I'm a little torn between using either. A website is an application (if it's dynamic, so to speak), but in other cases it is just a collection of files used by Apache.
The default www dir lives in /var/www/
, so should we follow suit by using /var/websites/
(or something similar), or choose /usr/websites/
since they could be applications?
This is a very trivial question, but it's bugging me nonetheless. For our case, I'm leaning toward /usr/web
or something like that, since our websites are all applications.
Update:
This is for our company websites; it's not a shared hosting server, so we don't need to worry about separating them in /home/
or anything like that.
© Server Fault or respective owner