Differences between "apache"'s installations

Posted by JustTrying on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by JustTrying
Published on 2012-11-09T10:45:09Z Indexed on 2012/11/09 11:06 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 460

Filed under:
|
|
|

Using Ubuntu 12.04, are there any differences between installing Apache httpd using sudo apt-get install apache2 (as the guide of Ubuntu says - https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/serverguide/httpd.html ) or following the steps on the Apache documentation (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/install.html#overview)?

I tried both ways; in the first case (using apt-get) the server seems to work - I open a browser page and I got it. In the second case I need other packages (apr, apr-util and pcre) and so I abandoned the attempt.

© Server Fault or respective owner

Differences between "apache"'s installations

Posted by JustTrying on Ask Ubuntu See other posts from Ask Ubuntu or by JustTrying
Published on 2012-11-09T10:23:55Z Indexed on 2012/11/09 11:21 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 460

Filed under:
|
|

Are there any differences between installing Apache httpd using sudo apt-get install apache2 (as the guide of Ubuntu says - https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/serverguide/httpd.html ) or following the steps on the Apache documentation (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/install.html#overview)?

I tried both ways; in the first case (using apt-get) the server seems to work - I open a browser page and I got it. In the second case I need other packages (apr, apr-util and pcre) and so I abandoned the attempt.

© Ask Ubuntu or respective owner

Related posts about apache2

Related posts about installation