Redhat cluster Vs Pacemaker Vs Gluster Vs Sheepdog

Posted by chandank on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by chandank
Published on 2012-12-11T23:23:36Z Indexed on 2012/12/13 23:05 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 332

Filed under:
|
|
|
|

Changing the entire question as earlier one was very confusing.

I have been exploring different clustering system to run Virtual machines on two different machines on LAN with high availability.

Currently I am already using DRBD resource on two different machines on Primary/Secondary mode. In case the primary fails I manually promote the secondary to Primary and start the VM.

I also explored Gluster and looks good, however, I would rather prefer clustering over Gluster (user space FS).

So if anyone has idea which one would be better from ease of use prospective please I would be interested in.

Moreover, sheepdog project appears good, however, could not find much documentations/Howtos.

I am using Centos 6.

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about centos

Related posts about redhat