for what reason live USB linux images are not 100% persistent?
Posted
by
gcb
on Super User
See other posts from Super User
or by gcb
Published on 2012-12-16T02:47:48Z
Indexed on
2012/12/16
5:08 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 465
I understand that during CD-R times non-persistence had a purpose, but what's the purpose now that pretty much everyone uses USB flash drivers?
not to mention USB3 sticks are pretty much 4x faster than my HD raid.
I'm writing this while taking a break going over the linux from scratch guide... And i'm still baffled that this is not the norm already with all live images.
So, Is there any reason (besides historical) that i'm missing and that will bite me after I finish this ext3-rw image?
© Super User or respective owner