Agile bug fixing - what's the preferred process for testing?

Posted by Andrew Stephens on Programmers See other posts from Programmers or by Andrew Stephens
Published on 2013-06-28T10:56:23Z Indexed on 2013/06/28 16:30 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 343

When a bug is fixed, the dev set its status to "resolved" and the bug is reassigned back to the person that created it. In our case this is usually the product owner - we don't have dedicated testers.

But what's a good process for controlling how/when the PO tests the software? Should he be given the latest build after each bug is resolved/checked-in? Or what about every morning? Or should he only receive a build at (or close to) the end of the iteration, to include all of that iteration's new functionality and bug fixes?

We are using TFS by the way.

© Programmers or respective owner

Related posts about agile

Related posts about team-foundation-server