Why is filesystem preferred for logs instead of RDBMS?

Posted by Yasir on Programmers See other posts from Programmers or by Yasir
Published on 2011-07-12T12:04:23Z Indexed on 2013/07/01 16:29 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 317

Filed under:
|
|
|
|

Question should be clear from its title. For example Apache saves its access and error logs in files instead of RDBMS no matter on how large or small scale it is being utilized.

For RDMS we just have to write SQL queries and it will do the work while for files we must decide a particular format and then write regex or may be parsers to manipulate them. And those might even fail in particular circumstances if great care was not paid.

Yet everyone seems to prefer filesystem for maintaining the logs. I am not biased against any of these methods but I would like to know why it is practiced like this. Is it speed or maintainability or something else?

© Programmers or respective owner

Related posts about sql

Related posts about history